Back Home
Attorney Profiles
Areas Of Practice
The Legal Buzz
Video Spotlights
Santa Party
Contact Us
 
Locations and Directions
 
 
 
 

BRIEF BYTES: Question and Answer Forum

   The purpose is to answer frequently asked or unusual questions. Topics will range from real estate, business, litigation and trusts and estates. Your feedback is appreciated. Direct your comments to Cherisse Roy at croy@scott-harris.com

WHEN THE DEPOSIT CHECK BOUNCES

  Buyers should be made aware of the serious consequences of failure to pay a deposit when due. Under the terms of the FAR/Bar contract, and the terms of most other form contracts, failure to pay a deposit is a breach which allows the seller to terminate. Further, the default clauses in these contracts provide for liquidated damages in an amount equal to the amount of the deposits "paid and/or to be paid." Therefore, if an initial deposit is paid, but the buyer fails to pay an additional deposit when it is due, the seller can terminate and is entitled to damages in the total amount of all the deposits that were to be paid regardless of whether they were actually paid.

  The consequences can even be worse if the check given for the deposit bounces. In KEHLE V MODANSKY the court was dealing with a deposit check in the amount of $120,000.00 which was returned for insufficient funds. The failure of the check was a failure to pay the deposit and therefore an automatic breach of the contract which entitled the seller to terminate the contract. When the seller sued, the trial court granted the seller's motion for summary judgment and awarded $120,000 as liquidated damages pursuant to the terms of the contract and $360,000 for treble damages as a result of appellant's tender of a worthless check pursuant to section 68.065, Florida Statutes. Therefore, the buyer became obligated to pay a total of $480,000.00 as a result of the issuance of a worthless check as the deposit under the contract.

  The buyer raised as a defense that he did not know there were insufficient funds to pay the check. The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision and ruled that although the lack of knowledge that the check was not good would be a defense to a criminal action, it was not a defense to a civil action for treble damages under section 68.065.

  The moral to the story is that all Relators should make their buyers aware of the need to timely pay the original and all additional deposits, and that they should never write a check for the deposit unless they know the check will clear.

 

  To Contact Us, call (561) 624-3900. Or fax
(561) 624-3533. To correspond online, please fill out our contact form with your comments.

 

This web site presents general information about Scott, Harris, Bryan, Barra & Jorgensen, P.A. and is not intended as legal advice nor should you consider it as such. Merely contacting Scott, Harris, Bryan, Barra & Jorgensen will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship had been established.