Back Home
Attorney Profiles
Areas Of Practice
The Legal Buzz
Video Spotlights
Santa Party
Contact Us
 
Locations and Directions
 
 
 
 

BRIEF BYTES: Question and Answer Forum

   The purpose is to answer frequently asked or unusual questions. Topics will range from real estate, business, litigation and trusts and estates. Your feedback is appreciated. Direct your comments to Cherisse Roy at croy@scott-harris.com

CHARGING A PROCESSING FEE

  I read with interest an article entitled "Coming: The Transaction Fee" which appeared in the May issue of the National Association of REALTORS publication Today's REALTOR. The article can be reviewed on the internet at ONE REALTOR PLACE. The author noted that REALTORS in Florida had discovered a new income source called a transaction fee or a processing fee. Although the article gives Florida credit for pioneering this new form of compensation, it appears that the concept is spreading elsewhere.

  I recently handled a residential sale involving a mortgage lender. The listing broker charged a processing fee. When we prepared the HUD-1 Settlement Statement and placed the processing fee on the statement as a seller's expense, we were contacted by the mortgage lender and actually asked to render a legal opinion that the payment of the processing fee to the broker is not a violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA).

  Apparently, this particular lender had not previously seen the processing fee on a settlement statement and was concerned that any fee paid to a provider of settlement services that was not within the usual and customary category of fees might be a "kick back" prohibited by the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). I issued an opinion letter which stated that the payment of the transaction fee was compensation for additional services rendered. My opinion is that a commission paid to a licensed real estate broker is compensation paid to the procuring cause of sale or under the terms of an exclusive right of sale listing agreement. The processing fee is a fee for services rendered by the broker over and above the compensation agreed to be paid to procuring cause or under the terms and provisions of an exclusive right of sale listing agreement. Therefore, I clearly do not believe that the payment of a processing fee violates the terms of RESPA.

  REALTORS perform many services for the buyer and the seller which are outside the scope of the services for which they are actually compensated when they receive a commission. Traditionally, REALTORS have performed services in connection with coordinating the closing and all the matters that must be accomplished prior to closing to protect the transaction and to aid the transaction to closing so that the commission can be paid. However, there is no reason, in logic or law, that the REALTOR should not be paid additional compensation for these additional services. Therefore, I certainly believe there is no legal argument against the charge and collection of a transaction fee or a processing fee.

  The author of the article appearing in Today's REALTOR contacted Jim Mitchell, assistant attorney general assigned to the Florida Real Estate Commission. Mr. Mitchell stated that the Florida Real Estate Commission has received complaints involving sales people who charged transaction or processing fees and who did not fully disclose the fees until closing. Therefore, any REALTOR considering the charge of a processing fee or transaction fee should certainly make certain that the charge is a matter of contract. In my view, a REALTOR should not charge a transaction fee or processing fee unless there is an agreement (preferably in writing) that the REALTOR will be paid for rendering processing or transaction services over and above the commission paid for being procuring cause. I certainly believe that the payment of a transaction or processing fee should be fixed in the listing agreement or in the buyer representation agreement and there should be an adequate disclosure in the agreement that such charge will be paid. In fact, Jim Mitchell has indicated that failure to adequately disclose that an additional processing or transaction fee will be charged may result in the broker who fails to make such disclosure being charged with dishonest dealing under Chapter 475 of the Florida Statutes.


  To Contact Us, call (561) 624-3900. Or fax
(561) 624-3533. To correspond online, please fill out our contact form with your comments.

 

This web site presents general information about Scott, Harris, Bryan, Barra & Jorgensen, P.A. and is not intended as legal advice nor should you consider it as such. Merely contacting Scott, Harris, Bryan, Barra & Jorgensen will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship had been established.